The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act and Arizona Casinos

Casinos are nothing new and they can be foundregulatory authority when it comes to Indian
just about anywhere your travels take you in thereservation casinos.
United States. The state of Arizona is noThe Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988
different. If you live in Arizona or have traveledpermitted states and Indian Tribes to be able to
there, you have likely passed by one or more ofregulate Class III Tribal gaming, which is inclusive
the ever popular casinos in the desert southwest.of games such as blackjack, slot machines, keno
A study done by NAU (Northern Arizonaand other such related casino style games.
University) confirmed the popularity through anDuring the early 1990s, there were several
extensive research project. NAU researchedArizona Tribes that had installed slot machines in
gaming and when the study was completed, thetheir casinos even though none of them had
results were very clear. The report indicated thatTribal-State Gaming Compacts with the state. At
one-third of all Arizonans responded that theythat time, the Arizona governor Symington
too, had gambled in a casino in Arizona.believed that Native American reservations should
In 1988, the U.S. It was Congress who passed annot be allowed to have casinos, because at that
act which later became known as the Indiantime, Arizona did not permit any gambling that
Gaming Regulatory Act, also referred to as IGRA.was considered to be off-reservation.
IGRA has long recognized the popularTribes contended that Arizona was already
entertainment form of gaming and has used it aspermitting gambling by allowing gambling acts such
a means to promote economic development ofas horse and dog racing, charity bingo games, as
many Indian Tribes.well as the state lotteries that were readily
There are many people who honestly believe thatavailable.
casinos have been the answer to NativeThe National Indian Gaming Commission issued
Americans becoming self sufficient in order to berules that clarified these rules in 1992, which said
able to promote their own Tribal governmentthat a Tribe must have a gaming Compact with a
through the money profits of these such Arizonastate before it is allowed to operate slot machines
casinos.on its land.
The AIGA organization represents theFollowing this ruling, the Arizona Governor called
membership of some 19 Tribes and represent 90on the United States Attorney in Phoenix,
percent of the Native American Indians who liveArizona, to proceed to shut down any and all
on the reservations within the sate of Arizona.casinos that had slot machines. It was like
This organization was created to help bothsomething that you would see in a movie. FBI
protect and promote the welfare of Nativeagents raided several Indian gaming casinos and
American Indian Tribes. Their focus has been, andseized their gaming slot machines.
still is, is to help their members strive to be selfAt the Fort McDowell Casino located near
reliant.Scottsdale, Arizona, many of the Native American
The organization stands by their belief that theyTribal members tried to prevent these agents
are most definitely committed to both maintainingfrom removing their slot machines by forming a
and protecting the Indian sovereign governmentblockade which resulted in a three week long
authority. The IGRA Regulatory Act allows anystandoff.
state to operate Indian gaming on reservations ifOne year later in 1993, the governor signed off
the state permits such gaming off-reservation.on an agreement with the Native American Indian
The IGRA Act was a result of a Supreme Courttribes which allowed Tribes to have these gaming
ruling that basically said that states do not haveslot machines on each of their reservations.
any leverage over gaming on any United StatesNot included in this Compact agreement were any
Tribe reservation.table games. In 2003, however, the popular game
Prior to this Act, the 1987 U.S. Supreme Courtof blackjack was added to the list of table games
ruling in California v. Cabazon Band of Missionthat were allowed.
Indians, really meant that states do not have any