Indian Removal initiated under Jackson

When Andrew Jackson became a president inwhite Americans to gain a control over the land
1829, 125,000 Native Americans still lived east ofof Native Americans and control over the
the Mississippi River. 60,000 of Cherokees,resources that were on that land. Even if the
Creeks, Choctaw, and Chickasaw Indians heldgovernment wanted to protect Indians it had a
millions of acres in Georgia, Alabama, andlack of resources and military to protect them
Mississippi. The most crucial political issues at thatfrom white farmers, traders, and speculators.
time were if all of these Indians would be allowedThe main goal of Jackson's policy was to
to stop the expansion of white man and if theencourage Indians to voluntarily sell their land in
U.S. government would tolerate the previousexchange for new land in Oklahoma and Arkansas.
treaties with Indians. Under Jackson's presidencyDoing this Jackson hoped that it would satisfy
two solutions of this issue were possible:both parties. White farmers could get new
assimilation and removal. Assimilation meant thatfarmland and Native Americans would get peace
Native Americans would have to become similarfrom disturbers. It was supposed to be
to white people. They would have to adoptvoluntarily, however, those that did not want to
cultural and economic practices of whiteleave Jackson simply promised to destroy. As the
Americans. The Cherokee showed the ability toprevious military leader Jackson and everybody
adopt. They opened schools, churches, startedknew what he was talking about.
building roads, started to use printing press, andDuring winter of 1831 the Choctaw tribe was the
even adopted constitution. However, there wasfirst one to start the Trail of Tears. The
another policy concerning Native Americans - theirgovernment failed its promises to help Indians
removal. It was first introduced by Thomasmoving and a lot of them died from epidemic
Jefferson who believed that Indian removal is thediseases that were easy to get during the winter.
only way to ensure the survival of NativeThen, in 1836, the Creek faced difficulties during
American cultures. The main point of this policytheir removal. About 3500 of the tribe's 15,000
was to encourage Indians to move voluntarily tomembers died along the westward trek. Those
the lands where they would be left alone and notwho resisted removal were bound in chains and
harassed by the white men.marched in double file.
At first Jackson supported both policies but laterBy 1837, the Jackson had removed 46,000 Native
favored the removal policy as the solution to theAmerican people from their land east of the
controversy. This shift happened partly becauseMississippi. Most members of the five
of the controversy between the Cherokees andsoutheastern nations were relocated and that
the state of Georgia. Cherokees adopted theiropened 25 million acres of land to white me.
own constitution that protected the sovereigntyJackson's removal policy can only be appropriately
of their land. However, when gold was found oncomprehended if it is viewed as a part of a bigger
the Cherokees' land people rushed their looking forcourse of the political and economic conquest of
it. Of course, Cherokees were not happy about itfrontier regions by expanding nation states. At the
and that resulted two most prominent casesbeginning of 1800's, all western nations were
Cherokee Nation vs. Georgia in 1831 andpiercing into many new frontier areas, including the
Worcester vs. Georgia. Cherokee Nation wantedsteppes of Russia, the pampas of Argentina, the
to protect their land from the intruders using theveldt of South Africa, the outback of Australia,
court system. Both cases were won byand the American West. In every region, national
Cherokees and the government had an obligationexpansion was justified on the grounds of
to exclude white intruders from the Indian land.strategic interest (to anticipate settlement by
Jackson became very angry with that decisionother powers) or in the name of opening valuable
and decided to implement the removal policy.land to white settlement and development. Almost
However, the actual cause for implementation ofin each case the expansion was carried through
this policy was simply a great desire by mostremoval all massacring the whole native population.